Shajib, A. J.Birrer, S.Treu, T.Auger, M. W.Agnello, A.Anguita, T.Buckley-Geer, E. J.Chan, J. H. H.Collett, T. E.Courbin, F.Fassnacht, C. D.Frieman, J.Kayo, I.Lemon, C.Lin, H.Marshall, P. J.Mcmahon, R.More, A.Morgan, N. D.Motta, V.Oguri, M.Ostrovski, F.Rusu, C. E.Schechter, P. L.Shanks, T.Suyu, S. H.Meylan, G.Abbott, T. M. C.Allam, S.Annis, J.Avila, S.Bertin, E.Brooks, D.Carnero Rosell, A.Carrasco Kind, M.Carretero, J.Cunha, VDa Costa, L. N.De Vicente, J.Desai, S.Doel, P.Flaugher, B.Fosalba, P.Garcia-Bellido, J.Gerdes, D. W.Gruen, D.Gruendl, R. A.Gutierrez, G.Hartley, W. G.Hollowood, D. L.Hoyle, B.James, D. J.Kuehn, K.Kuropatkin, N.Lahav, O.Lima, M.Maia, M. A. G.March, M.Marshall, J. L.Melchior, P.Menanteau, F.Miquel, R.Plazas, A. A.Sanchez, E.Scarpine, V.Sevilla-Noarbe, I.Smith, M.Soares-Santos, M.Sobreira, F.Suchyta, E.Swanson, M. E. C.Tarle, G.Walker, A. R.2022-11-302022-11-302021A J Shajib, S Birrer, T Treu, M W Auger, A Agnello, T Anguita, E J Buckley-Geer, J H H Chan, T E Collett, F Courbin, C D Fassnacht, J Frieman, I Kayo, C Lemon, H Lin, P J Marshall, R McMahon, A More, N D Morgan, V Motta, M Oguri, F Ostrovski, C E Rusu, P L Schechter, T Shanks, S H Suyu, G Meylan, T M C Abbott, S Allam, J Annis, S Avila, E Bertin, D Brooks, A Carnero Rosell, M Carrasco Kind, J Carretero, C E Cunha, L N da Costa, J De Vicente, S Desai, P Doel, B Flaugher, P Fosalba, J García-Bellido, D W Gerdes, D Gruen, R A Gruendl, G Gutierrez, W G Hartley, D L Hollowood, B Hoyle, D J James, K Kuehn, N Kuropatkin, O Lahav, M Lima, M A G Maia, M March, J L Marshall, P Melchior, F Menanteau, R Miquel, A A Plazas, E Sanchez, V Scarpine, I Sevilla-Noarbe, M Smith, M Soares-Santos, F Sobreira, E Suchyta, M E C Swanson, G Tarle, A R Walker, Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 501, Issue 2, February 2021, Pages 2833–2835, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3562http://repositoriobibliotecas.uv.cl/handle/uvscl/7541The paper ‘Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars’ was published in MNRAS, 483, 4, 5649–5671 (2019). The coordinate values of the image positions in table 4 were wrongly printed due to a clerical error. At a later stage of writing the manuscript, we have changed the zero-point definition of the lens coordinate systems, but the relative image positions were not accounted for this change of definition while printing out table 4. We provide the updated Table 4 below. This error does not impact any other results of the paper in any way, except for the table itself. We thank Collin Werner and Paul Schechter for helping us identify this error.© 2021 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical SocietyERRATAADDENDAGRAVITATIONAL LENSING: STRONGMETHODS: DATA ANALYSISGALAXIES: ELLIPTICAL AND LENTICULARCDGALAXIES: STRUCTUREArticulohttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3562