Argumentation of Prospective Mathematics Teachers in Fraction Tasks Mediated by an Online Assessment System With Automatic Feedback
Archivos
Fecha
2021
Autores
Profesor Guía
Formato del documento
Articulo
ORCID Autor
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Modestum
Ubicación
ISBN
ISSN
item.page.issne
item.page.doiurl
Facultad
Facultad de Ciencias
Departamento o Escuela
Instituto de Matematicass
Determinador
Recolector
Especie
Nota general
Resumen
This article reports the argumentation work of a group of trainee mathematics teachers in an experiment carried out in a virtual class (due to the emergence of COVID-19) during 2020. They worked with a task on fractions in an online assessment system with questions with random parameters and infinite possible correct answers. This was followed by a discussion of the strategies and the justifications, arguments and validations of these strategies and other conjectures that emerged. This article analyzes this work from a qualitative approach using the Mathematical Working Space as a theoretical framework. The results show that the discussion work led the trainee teachers to find interpretations for the algorithms processed by the computer, enhancing epistemic discourse and argumentation in the context of the use of technological artifacts. In turn, the same discourses allowed the future teachers to instrumentalize the processes to be used in new tasks.
Descripción
Lugar de Publicación
Auspiciador
Palabras clave
MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY, PROOF AND DISCOURSE, TASK DESIGN, ONLINE TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGIES
Licencia
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.