False lumen pressure estimation in type B aortic dissection using 4D fow cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparisons with aortic growth
Archivos
Fecha
2021
Profesor Guía
Formato del documento
Articulo
ORCID Autor
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Bmc
Ubicación
ISBN
ISSN
item.page.issne
item.page.doiurl
Facultad
Facultad de Ingeniería
Departamento o Escuela
Escuela de Ingenieria Civil Biomedica
Determinador
Recolector
Especie
Nota general
Resumen
Background. Chronic type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is associated with poor long-term outcome, and accurate risk stratification tools remain lacking. Pressurization of the false lumen (FL) has been recognized as central in promoting aortic growth. Several surrogate imaging-based metrics have been proposed to assess FL hemodynamics; however, their relationship to enlarging aortic dimensions remains unclear. We investigated the association between aortic growth and three cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived metrics of FL pressurization: false lumen ejection fraction (FLEF), maximum systolic deceleration rate (MSDR), and FL relative pressure (FL ΔPmax).
Methods. CMR/CMR angiography was performed in 12 patients with chronic dissection of the descending thoracoabdominal aorta, including contrast-enhanced CMR angiography and time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast CMR (4D Flow CMR). Aortic growth rate was calculated as the change in maximal aortic diameter between baseline and follow-up imaging studies over the time interval, with patients categorized as having either ‘stable’ (< 3 mm/year) or ‘enlarging’ (≥ 3 mm/year) growth. Three metrics relating to FL pressurization were defined as: (1) FLEF: the ratio between retrograde and antegrade flow at the TBAD entry tear, (2) MSDR: the absolute difference between maximum and minimum systolic acceleration in the proximal FL, and (3) FL ΔPmax: the difference in absolute pressure between aortic root and distal FL.
Results. FLEF was higher in enlarging TBAD (49.0 ± 17.9% vs. 10.0 ± 11.9%, p = 0.002), whereas FL ΔPmax was lower (32.2 ± 10.8 vs. 57.2 ± 12.5 mmHg/m, p = 0.017). MSDR and conventional anatomic variables did not differ significantly between groups. FLEF showed positive (r = 0.78, p = 0.003) correlation with aortic growth rate whereas FL ΔPmax showed negative correlation (r = − 0.64, p = 0.026). FLEF and FL ΔPmax remained as independent predictors of aortic growth rate after adjusting for baseline aortic diameter.
Conclusion. Comparative analysis of three 4D flow CMR metrics of TBAD FL pressurization demonstrated that those that focusing on retrograde flow (FLEF) and relative pressure (FL ΔPmax) independently correlated with growth and differentiated patients with enlarging and stable descending aortic dissections. These results emphasize the highly variable nature of aortic hemodynamics in TBAD patients, and suggest that 4D Flow CMR derived metrics of FL pressurization may be useful to separate patients at highest and lowest risk for progressive aortic growth and complications.
Descripción
Lugar de Publicación
Auspiciador
Palabras clave
TYPE B AORTIC DISSECTION, 4D FLOW MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, |4D FLOW MRI, FALSE LUMEN, AORTIC GROWTH RATE, FALSE LUMEN EJECTION FRACTION, MAXIMUM SYSTOLIC DECELERATION RATE, RELATIVE PRESSURE
Licencia
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License