Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars

dc.contributor.authorShajib, A. J.
dc.contributor.authorBirrer, S.
dc.contributor.authorTreu, T.
dc.contributor.authorAuger, M. W.
dc.contributor.authorAgnello, A.
dc.contributor.authorAnguita, T.
dc.contributor.authorBuckley-Geer, E. J.
dc.contributor.authorChan, J. H. H.
dc.contributor.authorCollett, T. E.
dc.contributor.authorCourbin, F.
dc.contributor.authorFassnacht, C. D.
dc.contributor.authorFrieman, J.
dc.contributor.authorKayo, I.
dc.contributor.authorLemon, C.
dc.contributor.authorLin, H.
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, P. J.
dc.contributor.authorMcmahon, R.
dc.contributor.authorMore, A.
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, N. D.
dc.contributor.authorMotta, V.
dc.contributor.authorOguri, M.
dc.contributor.authorOstrovski, F.
dc.contributor.authorRusu, C. E.
dc.contributor.authorSchechter, P. L.
dc.contributor.authorShanks, T.
dc.contributor.authorSuyu, S. H.
dc.contributor.authorMeylan, G.
dc.contributor.authorAbbott, T. M. C.
dc.contributor.authorAllam, S.
dc.contributor.authorAnnis, J.
dc.contributor.authorAvila, S.
dc.contributor.authorBertin, E.
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, D.
dc.contributor.authorCarnero Rosell, A.
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco Kind, M.
dc.contributor.authorCarretero, J.
dc.contributor.authorCunha, V
dc.contributor.authorDa Costa, L. N.
dc.contributor.authorDe Vicente, J.
dc.contributor.authorDesai, S.
dc.contributor.authorDoel, P.
dc.contributor.authorFlaugher, B.
dc.contributor.authorFosalba, P.
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Bellido, J.
dc.contributor.authorGerdes, D. W.
dc.contributor.authorGruen, D.
dc.contributor.authorGruendl, R. A.
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez, G.
dc.contributor.authorHartley, W. G.
dc.contributor.authorHollowood, D. L.
dc.contributor.authorHoyle, B.
dc.contributor.authorJames, D. J.
dc.contributor.authorKuehn, K.
dc.contributor.authorKuropatkin, N.
dc.contributor.authorLahav, O.
dc.contributor.authorLima, M.
dc.contributor.authorMaia, M. A. G.
dc.contributor.authorMarch, M.
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, J. L.
dc.contributor.authorMelchior, P.
dc.contributor.authorMenanteau, F.
dc.contributor.authorMiquel, R.
dc.contributor.authorPlazas, A. A.
dc.contributor.authorSanchez, E.
dc.contributor.authorScarpine, V.
dc.contributor.authorSevilla-Noarbe, I.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, M.
dc.contributor.authorSoares-Santos, M.
dc.contributor.authorSobreira, F.
dc.contributor.authorSuchyta, E.
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, M. E. C.
dc.contributor.authorTarle, G.
dc.contributor.authorWalker, A. R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T02:46:58Z
dc.date.available2022-11-30T02:46:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe paper ‘Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars’ was published in MNRAS, 483, 4, 5649–5671 (2019). The coordinate values of the image positions in table 4 were wrongly printed due to a clerical error. At a later stage of writing the manuscript, we have changed the zero-point definition of the lens coordinate systems, but the relative image positions were not accounted for this change of definition while printing out table 4. We provide the updated Table 4 below. This error does not impact any other results of the paper in any way, except for the table itself. We thank Collin Werner and Paul Schechter for helping us identify this error.en_ES
dc.facultadFacultad de Cienciasen_ES
dc.file.nameShajib_Err2021.pdf
dc.identifier.citationA J Shajib, S Birrer, T Treu, M W Auger, A Agnello, T Anguita, E J Buckley-Geer, J H H Chan, T E Collett, F Courbin, C D Fassnacht, J Frieman, I Kayo, C Lemon, H Lin, P J Marshall, R McMahon, A More, N D Morgan, V Motta, M Oguri, F Ostrovski, C E Rusu, P L Schechter, T Shanks, S H Suyu, G Meylan, T M C Abbott, S Allam, J Annis, S Avila, E Bertin, D Brooks, A Carnero Rosell, M Carrasco Kind, J Carretero, C E Cunha, L N da Costa, J De Vicente, S Desai, P Doel, B Flaugher, P Fosalba, J García-Bellido, D W Gerdes, D Gruen, R A Gruendl, G Gutierrez, W G Hartley, D L Hollowood, B Hoyle, D J James, K Kuehn, N Kuropatkin, O Lahav, M Lima, M A G Maia, M March, J L Marshall, P Melchior, F Menanteau, R Miquel, A A Plazas, E Sanchez, V Scarpine, I Sevilla-Noarbe, M Smith, M Soares-Santos, F Sobreira, E Suchyta, M E C Swanson, G Tarle, A R Walker, Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 501, Issue 2, February 2021, Pages 2833–2835, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3562en_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3562
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositoriobibliotecas.uv.cl/handle/uvscl/7541
dc.languageen
dc.publisherRoyal Astronomical Society
dc.rights© 2021 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society
dc.sourceMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
dc.subjectERRATAen_ES
dc.subjectADDENDAen_ES
dc.subjectGRAVITATIONAL LENSING: STRONGen_ES
dc.subjectMETHODS: DATA ANALYSISen_ES
dc.subjectGALAXIES: ELLIPTICAL AND LENTICULARen_ES
dc.subjectCDen_ES
dc.subjectGALAXIES: STRUCTUREen_ES
dc.titleErratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars
dc.typeArticulo
uv.departamentoInstituto de Fisica y Astronomia
uv.notageneralNo disponible para descarga

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Shajib_Err2021_noaccesible_.pdf
Tamaño:
698.13 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción: