Metal Ecotoxicity Studies with Artificially Contaminated versus Anthropogenically Contaminated Soils: Literature Review, Methodological Pitfalls and Research Priorities

Vista sencilla de Ć­tem
dc.contributor.authorSanta-Cruz, J.
dc.contributor.authorVasenev, I. I.
dc.contributor.authorGaete, H.
dc.contributor.authorPeƱaloza, P.
dc.contributor.authorKrutyakov, Yu. A.
dc.contributor.authorNeamang, A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T02:46:56Z
dc.date.available2022-11-30T02:46:56Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractMost ecotoxicological studies on the toxicity of metals in soil are conducted using artificially contaminated soils, i.e., originally uncontaminated soils to which increasing amounts of metals are added in the form of soluble salts in a laboratory setting. This approach has been rightly criticized because of the difficulty of extrapolating the results to real field situations. In our literature review, all studies without exception demonstrated a higher toxicity of metals in artificially contaminated soils than in anthropogenically contaminated soils exposed to pollution a few decades ago. Therefore, the traditional approach to the analysis of metal toxicity in soils, which is based on metal enrichment, has become outdated; new studies with such soils cannot provide any original insights at this time. We encourage researchers of metal pollution from anthropogenic emissions to analyze dose-effect relationships using native field-collected soils, rather than adopting the standard approach, which is based on artificially contaminated soils.en_ES
dc.facultadFacultad de IngenierĆ­aen_ES
dc.file.nameSantacruz_Met2021.pdf
dc.identifier.citationSanta-Cruz, J., Vasenev, I.I., Gaete, H. et al. Metal Ecotoxicity Studies with Artificially Contaminated versus Anthropogenically Contaminated Soils: Literature Review, Methodological Pitfalls and Research Priorities. Russ J Ecol 52, 479ā€“485 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413621060126en_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413621060126
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositoriobibliotecas.uv.cl/handle/uvscl/7532
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.sourceRussian Journal of Ecology
dc.subjectARTIFICIALLY POLLUTED SOILen_ES
dc.subjectMETAL SPIKING, METAL-SPIKED SOILen_ES
dc.subjectFIELD-CONTAMINATED SOILen_ES
dc.subjectECOTOXICITY THRESHOLDSen_ES
dc.titleMetal Ecotoxicity Studies with Artificially Contaminated versus Anthropogenically Contaminated Soils: Literature Review, Methodological Pitfalls and Research Priorities
dc.typeArticulo
uv.departamentoEscuela de Ingenieria en Medioambiente
uv.notageneralNo disponible para descarga

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Santacruz_Met2021_noaccesible_.pdf
TamaƱo:
436.88 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
DescripciĆ³n:
Descargar

Colecciones

ArtĆ­culos investigadores UV